<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hearts Card Game Online	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://plays.org/hearts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://plays.org/hearts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 01:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: fartin' martin		</title>
		<link>https://plays.org/hearts/#comment-223118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fartin' martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 01:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://plays.org/?p=11622#comment-223118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ken i don&#039;t think it&#039;s a cheating scam game. the 3 opponents are powered by ai, but each individual opponent is capable of shortsighted moves, They have unique styles, but every style of play has something in common with other styles, including mine &#038; yours... If i understand you correctly, u said they have a similar style.... Well hello, each player has to observe the rules of the game, if we do sth out of synch ith the rules, the ai umpire tells us it&#039;s illegal... I can&#039;t see why you don&#039;t like it.... There are many versions online, so yr under no compulsion to play this one.... Your ultimjate vote of no confidence is never to play this one again.... no skin off anyone&#039;s nose...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ken i don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a cheating scam game. the 3 opponents are powered by ai, but each individual opponent is capable of shortsighted moves, They have unique styles, but every style of play has something in common with other styles, including mine &amp; yours&#8230; If i understand you correctly, u said they have a similar style&#8230;. Well hello, each player has to observe the rules of the game, if we do sth out of synch ith the rules, the ai umpire tells us it&#8217;s illegal&#8230; I can&#8217;t see why you don&#8217;t like it&#8230;. There are many versions online, so yr under no compulsion to play this one&#8230;. Your ultimjate vote of no confidence is never to play this one again&#8230;. no skin off anyone&#8217;s nose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Plays.org		</title>
		<link>https://plays.org/hearts/#comment-1965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plays.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://plays.org/?p=11622#comment-1965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ken
I edited out your curse word in your comment. This site aims to be family friendly!

For what it is worth, I went to the other site you mentioned and played it on hard mode &amp; shot the moon the first hand of the game. Then I though that was too easy so I looked and saw there was expert mode &amp; tried that. Then I once again shot the moon first hand of the game and only managed to score 15 points on expert (and some of those were defensive / strategic to ensure others couldn&#039;t shoot the moon). 
&lt;img src=&quot;https://plays.org/screenshots/hearts-too-easy.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;
So however that was coded even expert is quite easy.

I used to be in a job where we had down times where we played lots of cards (think fire station or military post as an example of job type) and played a ton of Hearts back in the day. The programming of the game on our site is decently challenging, but I find that more fun than shoot the moon at will sort of programming like so many other Hearts games have.

I think the aesthetics look nice on that other site you mentioned, but I like the programming of our game here more. The game here can be a bit tougher and sometimes frustrating, which is how I remember Hearts being when I played a lot about a decade ago.

If you cut your teeth playing on a game which was programmed to be super easy then it makes sense that you would find this game tougher and frustrating. 

In almost any game in life most people typically learn more through losses than from winning, so celebrate the learning &amp; improve your strategy. :)

If you enjoy easy wins then keep playing the easy wins version you played before.

If you want to get better at the game then play a more challenging version of it.

It is totally up to you what you are looking for in a game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken<br />
I edited out your curse word in your comment. This site aims to be family friendly!</p>
<p>For what it is worth, I went to the other site you mentioned and played it on hard mode &#038; shot the moon the first hand of the game. Then I though that was too easy so I looked and saw there was expert mode &#038; tried that. Then I once again shot the moon first hand of the game and only managed to score 15 points on expert (and some of those were defensive / strategic to ensure others couldn&#8217;t shoot the moon).<br />
<img src="https://plays.org/screenshots/hearts-too-easy.png?x77479" alt="" /><br />
So however that was coded even expert is quite easy.</p>
<p>I used to be in a job where we had down times where we played lots of cards (think fire station or military post as an example of job type) and played a ton of Hearts back in the day. The programming of the game on our site is decently challenging, but I find that more fun than shoot the moon at will sort of programming like so many other Hearts games have.</p>
<p>I think the aesthetics look nice on that other site you mentioned, but I like the programming of our game here more. The game here can be a bit tougher and sometimes frustrating, which is how I remember Hearts being when I played a lot about a decade ago.</p>
<p>If you cut your teeth playing on a game which was programmed to be super easy then it makes sense that you would find this game tougher and frustrating. </p>
<p>In almost any game in life most people typically learn more through losses than from winning, so celebrate the learning &#038; improve your strategy. 🙂</p>
<p>If you enjoy easy wins then keep playing the easy wins version you played before.</p>
<p>If you want to get better at the game then play a more challenging version of it.</p>
<p>It is totally up to you what you are looking for in a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken		</title>
		<link>https://plays.org/hearts/#comment-1963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://plays.org/?p=11622#comment-1963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My first impression of your Hearts game isn&#039;t good. I have played a number of online Hearts. 247hearts is the best imo. It seems almost as if the computer is actually three different people. Very realistic. I sharpened my skills there, and I win often but I do not win &#039;em all. As in real life, correct?  :)
Plays.org Hearts just sets you up and ****s you. Like a cheating scam hustle; but why so in a Free Game ???
I don&#039;t understand the logic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impression of your Hearts game isn&#8217;t good. I have played a number of online Hearts. 247hearts is the best imo. It seems almost as if the computer is actually three different people. Very realistic. I sharpened my skills there, and I win often but I do not win &#8217;em all. As in real life, correct?  🙂<br />
Plays.org Hearts just sets you up and ****s you. Like a cheating scam hustle; but why so in a Free Game ???<br />
I don&#8217;t understand the logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 10700/10711 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: plays.org @ 2026-05-01 15:33:30 by W3 Total Cache
-->